ft_directory (
ft_directory) wrote1999-06-11 08:38 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
HMD
Hi, and welcome to FH's gamewide How's My Driving meme.
Based on feedback in the Open Forums and the need to balance conversation and player comfort, we've made some changes to the setup and established a few more rules to help keep discussion productive.
Here's how it works:
Participation is completely voluntary.
Players who would like critique should ping in with your character journals (it's up to you whether you use one for each character, or just ping in once and list all the applicable characters). You can:
Other players will reply with constructive criticism, either logged-in or anonymously depending on what's been requested and their own comfort level.
Rules and Moderation
First, please know that while anon commenting is on, so is IP logging. The admins, who are the only ones who'll be able to see IP addresses, won't be participating in the meme ourselves, or using it frivolously to check up on who is saying what about who, or passing that info on to players. You can still give constructive criticism without worrying that it might be dismissed due to the source or cause personal friction, but we'll have a better ability to help keep things under control.
We also don't want to stifle discussion with too many rules, but in order to balance that with the comfort of our players, we do need some, and here they are:
If the admin team sees comments that appear to clash with the rules above, we'll freeze or screen the comment and ask the commenter to re-post without the problematic content.
Aside from those situations, the admins are only going to step in to ask that a thread be toned down if someone asks us to, or if we see blatant game-rules / LJ TOS breaking. However, if we see a situation where we suspect there might be a problem developing, what we will do is contact the original poster of the thread or sub-thread and ask if they'd like us to step in, or if they're doing OK on their own.
We understand that in the past, people weren't sure if coming to us would be overstepping, or didn't realize it was an option. It's not overstepping; it is an option. It's the best option. Please grab an admin if something being said is making you uncomfortable. Even if you're not directly involved in the thread or even participating in the meme, we can contact the OP to see if they'd like our help or not. You can use the OOC thread, grab one of us on IM, or send an e-mail to administration@fandomhigh.net.
Finally, for those participating, please remember that no matter how fast comments can fly if there's a disagreement, you're not obligated to reply. If you're uncomfortable with a question or a statement made in a comment, you can stop right there. You can ask the admins to intervene, or not address the comment at all.
You can also reply telling the poster that you're uncomfortable with something they said and would rather not pursue it, would like to take it to e-mail, or any other variation you prefer.
Or, to sum it up in the immortal words of some dudes from San Dimas, the main rule here is "Be excellent to each other." That's it, though if you have any questions, the floor is open in the OOC thread too.
Based on feedback in the Open Forums and the need to balance conversation and player comfort, we've made some changes to the setup and established a few more rules to help keep discussion productive.
Here's how it works:
Participation is completely voluntary.
Players who would like critique should ping in with your character journals (it's up to you whether you use one for each character, or just ping in once and list all the applicable characters). You can:
- Specify whether you're open to anon replies, or would only like replies from logged-in players
- Note specific areas/subjects you'd like crit on or would rather not discuss
- Ping in just to link to an HMD post in a personal journal where you control the settings (if you would like the admins to freeze that thread on the meme afterwards, just ping us in the OOC thread to let us know)
- Ping in to let people know that you'd rather receive crit via e-mail or PM (same as above, if you'd like the thread frozen afterwards, just let us know)
Other players will reply with constructive criticism, either logged-in or anonymously depending on what's been requested and their own comfort level.
Rules and Moderation
First, please know that while anon commenting is on, so is IP logging. The admins, who are the only ones who'll be able to see IP addresses, won't be participating in the meme ourselves, or using it frivolously to check up on who is saying what about who, or passing that info on to players. You can still give constructive criticism without worrying that it might be dismissed due to the source or cause personal friction, but we'll have a better ability to help keep things under control.
We also don't want to stifle discussion with too many rules, but in order to balance that with the comfort of our players, we do need some, and here they are:
- Taking players to task on the meme for their choices about how to receive crit (anon, public, e-mail, frozen threads, not participating at all) is out of bounds.
- Taking players to task on the meme for not replying to comments (or not replying quickly enough) is likewise off-limits. No player is required to be around all the time or be comfortable enough to engage in a dialogue about every critique they receive.
- Discussing the characters of players who haven't pinged into the meme is also out of bounds.
- Bringing up personal information found on the non-game journal of a player is off-limits as well. If there's something about someone's personal life that concerns you for game reasons, the HMD meme is not the place to say it; either contact the player privately about it, or if you feel it's appropriate, contact the admin team, but it doesn't belong on the meme.
If the admin team sees comments that appear to clash with the rules above, we'll freeze or screen the comment and ask the commenter to re-post without the problematic content.
Aside from those situations, the admins are only going to step in to ask that a thread be toned down if someone asks us to, or if we see blatant game-rules / LJ TOS breaking. However, if we see a situation where we suspect there might be a problem developing, what we will do is contact the original poster of the thread or sub-thread and ask if they'd like us to step in, or if they're doing OK on their own.
We understand that in the past, people weren't sure if coming to us would be overstepping, or didn't realize it was an option. It's not overstepping; it is an option. It's the best option. Please grab an admin if something being said is making you uncomfortable. Even if you're not directly involved in the thread or even participating in the meme, we can contact the OP to see if they'd like our help or not. You can use the OOC thread, grab one of us on IM, or send an e-mail to administration@fandomhigh.net.
Finally, for those participating, please remember that no matter how fast comments can fly if there's a disagreement, you're not obligated to reply. If you're uncomfortable with a question or a statement made in a comment, you can stop right there. You can ask the admins to intervene, or not address the comment at all.
You can also reply telling the poster that you're uncomfortable with something they said and would rather not pursue it, would like to take it to e-mail, or any other variation you prefer.
Or, to sum it up in the immortal words of some dudes from San Dimas, the main rule here is "Be excellent to each other." That's it, though if you have any questions, the floor is open in the OOC thread too.
Hows My Driving?
Topher Brink, Wesley Wyndam-Pryce
Anon or non-anon is fine!
Re: Topher Brink, Wesley Wyndam-Pryce
(Anonymous) 2011-06-11 08:17 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Topher Brink, Wesley Wyndam-Pryce
Re: Topher Brink, Wesley Wyndam-Pryce
But essentially, yes, what the anon above me said; you are a lot of fun to ping off of, though occasionally I do have to scramble a little bit to come up with something to keep the conversation going (which in my case may be as much my problem as anything). That said, I've never actually been frustrated when that situation comes up, because see above re: a lot of fun.
Re: Topher Brink, Wesley Wyndam-Pryce
...pinging as Wes because all of Topher's icons look mean.
Stephanie Brown/Gabrielle/Tahiri Veila/Kennedy/Samuel Anders etc.
Katina Choovanski -
Hit me here or at my HMD (http://brat-intraining.livejournal.com/6038.html) -- anon or non-anon is fine either way.
And yes, I know my attention span has been about the worst thing in the history of ever lately, for reasons I hope should sort themselves out soonish; I apologize for that, but yeah, my thread-dropping problem is bad lately and I know it.
Particular burning issues I wonder about lately: am I getting too reliant on certain words/phrases in my narrative? Am I getting too reliant on my narrative, period? (Which is to say, is there whoamuch expository crap/getting into my characters' heads/random weird unnecessary tangents going on in the narrative that really doesn't need to be there?) And the usual "Am I flogging one issue too much all the damn time with [insert character here]?" Or "Holy crapbuckets, Shanie, STOP BEING SO SRS BZNS?"
Although, you know, any commentary's cool. Unless you are disparaging my footwear.
Also, NOBODY IS REBOOTING ME OUT OF EXISTENCE. >:( *ahem*
Re: Stephanie Brown/Gabrielle/Tahiri Veila/Kennedy/Samuel Anders etc.
(Anonymous) 2011-06-11 03:43 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Stephanie Brown/Gabrielle/Tahiri Veila/Kennedy/Samuel Anders etc.
See, and me being me (read: too neurotic to live), now I have to worry if when I do that, it treads really closely to the line of "this is how I WANT YOU TO READ/REACT TO MY CHARACTER, DAMMIT."
Though thank you -- I'm glad it works for you! I always fret that I'm going all "HI, HAVE A HUGE RAMBLING CHUNK OF BACKSTORY BECAUSE I'M OVERINDULGENT AND HAVE NO SELF-CONTROL."
Re: Stephanie Brown/Gabrielle/Tahiri Veila/Kennedy/Samuel Anders etc.
(Anonymous) 2011-06-11 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Stephanie Brown/Gabrielle/Tahiri Veila/Kennedy/Samuel Anders etc.
Bobby Drake / Jake Doyle / Toby Logan / William Murdoch
Re: Bobby Drake / Jake Doyle / Toby Logan / William Murdoch
Ariel / Alexander of Daventry / Shunsui Kyōraku / Jane Porter / Butters Stotch / Charlie Swan
Re: Ariel / Alexander of Daventry / Shunsui Kyōraku / Jane Porter / Butters Stotch / Charlie Swan
(Anonymous) 2011-06-11 08:14 pm (UTC)(link)For example, Ariel at FH seems flightier and more flirtatious than she is in canon. Yes, she falls in love with a guy after seeing him dance on ship once for a few minutes, but that doesn't translate, to me, to her serial-dating and insta-crushing, and getting pouty when guys *don't* take an interest in her. It makes her seem spoiled and self-centered, which may be points you choose for characterization but I find it problematic.
Ariel also seems much more one dimensional than she does in canon. In the movie, she has scope and dreams and curiosity beyond her given world. At FH, she seems to base her interests around deep-frying food and the like. Some of that may just be 'I need a prompt for this post!' which I think we all go through sometimes. But Ariel's tendency to also write people off as boring/grumpy/unfun if they aren't interested in her, either conversationally or sexually, is jarring and doesn't mesh with the character I know from my childhood.
Re: Ariel / Alexander of Daventry / Shunsui Kyōraku / Jane Porter / Butters Stotch / Charlie Swan
I definitely don't want to say Ariel has developed much, but she had been at Fandom for over a year now. Of course she's not going to be the same character from your childhood, as she's had a year of different experiences under her belt. I agree that it's made her flightier. She's constantly being given new distractions and new exciting things to explore, so I imagine her attention span has gone to hell.
She is more flirtatious because she hasn't fallen in love at first sight with anyone and she's a bit more experienced in the field of love than canon Ariel might have been. I think it's really unfair to suggest that she's serial dating and insta-crushing, too. It's very easy for her to like people, but she even hasn't really dated anyone since Bruce. There's been some flirtations with Chuck, and she may be starting something up with a new character, but I hardly call that serial dating to be interested in someone. Or to acknowledge the fact that they are cute and attractive and potentially date-able.
I think writing people off as boring/grumpy/unfun if they aren't interested in the things she's interested is pretty canon, though, really. At least, usually in those situations, I try to think of how she'd try to coax Flouder into doing things, but perhaps I'm off-shooting it a little. It's true that I haven't really watched the main canon in a bit, but I do read a lot of the side stories and books that Disney puts out, and I use that as a lot of my source, since they go more into her character than a 90-or-so minute movie might. Canon memes have shown me that not as many people are familiar with those, so perhaps that's where some differences develop.
The focusing on a few things is mostly due to the fact that I have a lot going on and my availability is everywhere, so finding something to anchor her on makes it easier for me.
I'd absolutely love to develop something deeper, but, unfortunately, it never seems to work very well for me lately. Perhaps that means it's time to put her away, but, to be honest, I'm still having fun with her and would like to get a little more out.
I will definitely consider some of these criticisms and continue to try to improve myself, so thank you for the perspective. But I don't think the view is as narrow as you seem to think it is.
Re: Ariel / Alexander of Daventry / Shunsui Kyōraku / Jane Porter / Butters Stotch / Charlie Swan
(Anonymous) 2011-06-12 07:39 pm (UTC)(link)It's not whether Ariel dates around or has a steady. It's that she's heavily focused on boys. She flirts. If they don't flirt back, she pouts and writes them off. Girls, she competes with.
As a result, it feels like she's becoming increasingly one-note.
Re: Ariel / Alexander of Daventry / Shunsui Kyōraku / Jane Porter / Butters Stotch / Charlie Swan
Competing with other girls, though, I don't see that at all. I've always felt she's celebrated and encouraged the relationships of her friends. Sure, during last summer, she competed. She had to, worried about becoming seaweed and all. But definitely not so much anymore. Even Seifer's off limits just one the basis that Rinoa used to date him...
Re: Ariel / Alexander of Daventry / Shunsui Kyōraku / Jane Porter / Butters Stotch / Charlie Swan
(Anonymous) 2011-06-13 02:29 am (UTC)(link)I definitely see the competition with other girls. It always feels like Ariel's trying to show her friends how much prettier her dress is, or how she's had sex and maybe her friend hasn't, and what you might think of as enthusiasm comes across as competition between Ariel and the other girl. I can think of at least three scenes I've read or participated in where Ariel has made her female friend feel like less, or 'playfully' stole a guy from under her friend's nose, or flirted with the male counterpart of a couple to the extent that the female felt insecure about it.
You might not mean for her to be like this. But it definitely makes me wary of pinging with her, because it feels like no one is safe, and she'll flirt with a character's boyfriend, then turn around and act like the best of friends with her while being -- by my perceptions -- sort of passive-aggressive.
I'll also touch on the Seifer issue, though I have no dog in that race -- from reading those threads, it really does not read like Ariel has no intention of going after him. I'm not sure if I'm missing something, but it seems like there's a token amount of "He used to date Rinoa, I can't....but I'll flirt up a storm anyway!" And the Ariel I know from canon has stronger ties to friendship than that. I guess that's my biggest problem. Ariel's a Disney Princess. As such, she has personality traits that are universal across all of Disney's 'good guys'. She's compassionate. She's kind. She's a good friend. I don't see a lot of any of those traits in your Ariel.
Re: Ariel / Alexander of Daventry / Shunsui Kyōraku / Jane Porter / Butters Stotch / Charlie Swan
That is why I sign up for these. Because now I know about it, and now I can hopefully try to fix it or people will be honest with me and let me know when I've cross a line. I still have a right to defend my point. Though I may defend it, I will also do what I can to change it to make others comfortable, just like with Ariel's previous username.
It's a crit meme. It's not Let's Just Throw Stuff at Skylie so she can feel shitty about herself meme. I have a voice in this, too.
It's hard to take criticism when you truly don't see it, but I will try to watch for it. I guess it felt initially just more like less of a criticism and more of simply saying you don't like how I play the character. I honestly do not see myself as playing Ariel this way; it has never been my intention at all.
The way I see her, she is compassionate and kind and a good friend. So we're definitely looking through two different mirrors. Though if anyone reading this would like to address specific cases in which I have offended your character through Ariel's actions, please let me know. Her flirting is usually not anything serious; it's just her having fun and she has no intention of stealing anyone out from anyone else. Ever. She just likes to be friends with everyone. Not everyone who flirts is flirting to an end, but I will try to watch it.
Forgive me, for I apparently do not know what I do.
Re: Ariel / Alexander of Daventry / Shunsui Kyōraku / Jane Porter / Butters Stotch / Charlie Swan
(Anonymous) 2011-06-15 12:56 am (UTC)(link)Jack Priest / Juliet Darling / Tara Maclay / Quinn Fabray / Romeo Montague
I'm especially interested in:
* Any feedback on Tara's voice -- does she sound like herself?
* Do I give enough in narrative that you can tell where my character is coming from?
I know I have been flaky and generally not around as much for several months, and I think the reasons for that are understandable. That said, if I have actually been rude with it in some way, please let me know.
Re: Jack Priest / Juliet Darling / Tara Maclay / Quinn Fabray / Romeo Montague
Re: the narrative issue, this being my huge concern as well, I can definitely say that I've never felt lost as to where your characters are coming from in a thread, and I think any misreading I might do of a ping from time to time is on me for not being attentive.
Re: Tara's voice, I will say that these days she sounds closer to later-seasons Tara than she does to S4 Tara, but in the context of her character development in Fandom it makes sense. (Honestly, I have a really low tolerance for wildly OOC character voices in this fandom, so. Take that for what it's worth.) But beyond that, I think you've got it nailed down as far as her mindset and motivations and reactions to things, which IMO is more important than the exact minutiae of dialogue.
Momoko Akatsutsumi
Oh, and I played a back pocket potential, Archie Goodwin (
Dani Davis, Mary Connell, Lion-o, Harper Finkle, Hoshi Sato and Mike Cannon
I am trying to get out of a slump at the moment and I'm always looking for ways to make my posts more inviting of interaction.
Re: Dani Davis, Mary Connell, Lion-o, Harper Finkle, Hoshi Sato and Mike Cannon
Re: Dani Davis, Mary Connell, Lion-o, Harper Finkle, Hoshi Sato and Mike Cannon
And yes, Lion-o and Momoko need to do something together before the end of the summer.
Ramona, Sookie, Katniss, Puck, Belle, Robin, Rory
But yes - anything on my playing, characterization, etc. is totes welcome! I'm a little quiet today because I'm at my new house with no internet and phone pings are hard, but I'll answer any crit ASAP!
Rinoa, George, Alex, Alice, Rikku
Anon or non-anon, I don't mind.
Freddie Benson, Elphaba Thropp, Captain Hook
Anon, non anon, all is good.
And a reminder of my always-up concrit post - here (http://mm-squishy.livejournal.com/517.html?mode=reply).
James of Krondor
Re: Hows My Driving?
I only ask that all crit you toss at me here be face-on, and if you want to say something anonymously, I've now got a screened crit post over here.
OOC
Re: OOC
Re: OOC
Re: OOC
Re: OOC